Price: 1€
Interview 1: Hypnotic regression.
2. The interviewer asks her whether there are individuals that can’t be hypnotized. Wambach explains this is an erroneous notion we have about hypnosis. What she does is take people to a state very similar to sleep, to a state where there is rapid eye movement. Anyone can get into that state.
3. The interviewer asks her whether there is any difference between men and women. Wambach answers no. The difference is usually just in their conscious attitude towards hypnosis and reincarnation. In general, women are much more interested in spiritual matters and men use to be more skeptical, but it may happen that later during the session is the man the one that goes quicker into hypnosis and has past lives to report, while the woman doesn’t (in my opinion, I would say this would likely be due to having too many expectations). I have to say that this is completely true. In the forums I have known since I remember past lives, perhaps 90% of the users are women. Maybe the only reason for this is that women are more prone to share our feelings and talk about our spiritual experiences with other people.
4. Is sex retained from one life to the next? Of course not. Wambach states that all the subjects that have recalled more than three lives have switched biological sex. I know some people, usually religious, don’t like this statement, as they still have the obsolete idea that the soul has gender and therefore we can’t remember past lives of a different sex. The figures speak for themselves. Believe or not, I have encountered this type of people more than once... and it is impossible to reason with them.
6. By the time of this interview, past life therapists had already started to appear. I feel quite satisfied seeing how Helen Wambach was a real pioneer and many psychologists started using her methods. The problem is that later it got out of our hands... I wish a lot of therapists had maintained the same rational and scientific attitude as Wambach’s was, and I wish they had continued doing statistical analyses in a systematic way. Had it been so, things would be very different now. It is true regression therapy is useful to improve the symptoms of many patients. Wambach mentions that she conducted a survey among the therapists who were working this way, and she found that 62% of the patients did improve, which, compared to other therapies, is favorable, but, as everybody should know by now, it is not a miracle cure. I could speak about this for ages, but as I don't have much space, I will only make reference to this article. It has always been one of my fights.
7. I am delighted to see the parallelisms that exist between the way Wambach followed and the one I have followed myself. She was disappointed with religion and thought science would have the answers. I studied a science grade precisely for that, because in my yearning of learning more and revealing life’s mysteries, I thought that was the best way to do it. Says Wambach that she first became an agnostic about science, and then an atheist about science. I would say the same. For some time it was hard for me to accept there were so many narrow-minded scientists. Here a proof of it. But as we are talking about Helen Wambach today, I literally quote what she says in the interview:
“Science is basically the dogmatic belief that the left logical brain can figure out the world and arrange it satisfactorily and provide happiness. I think we have living proof today that's not true.”
8. Finally, Wambach surprised me claiming she had two near-death experiences. She personally lived what is like not to have your body function and yet to be vividly aware of everything. It surprised me because I didn’t know this fact, however I somehow sensed it. I will repeat it thousands of times: it is experience what changes you. And many times, we ourselves who have personal experiences, are the ones who devote our lives to research these phenomena in deep, acquiring even more certainty that death is not the end, while the majority of people keep discussing it eternally, from a intellectual or philosophical point of view, getting nowhere. You only need to spend five minutes in any group of skeptics to realize this. I repeat: there's none so blind as he who will not see.
Interview 2: Progressions.
I am not going to dwell much on this because it is very hard to verify the details that are obtained in progressions. It is obvious you can’t research anything until that future time arrives. I have found this brief reference to Wambach’s research, and it seems some of the things haven’t come about (though maybe it is too soon to speak, as others have):
There was evidence, she believed, that there was a decline of up to 95 percent of the population within a few generations. Concerned, Wambach asked one of her students to progress to a specific date in the late 1990s but had to bring the woman out of hypnotic trance rapidly after the woman found herself "choking to death on a big, black cloud". Wambach found predictions for the last years of the century to include severe earthquakes, a new US currency, severe weather patterns, financial crises, bank failures, an increase in volcanic activity and the decimation of a large number of people. In 1999, there would be an isolated incident in which a nuclear explosion in Europe kills many people.
http://www.carolmoore.net/articles/helenwambach.html
“The group research shows that the Earth in 2100 is largely bearing, vegetation has disappeared from the Earth, people live in enclosed cities, transparent domes, the food stuff they eat is some kind of an artificial one, which they describe as very bland. The population is 5% of what it is today, in 2100. Life is also pursued in a space colony, not on another planet and not on space ships, but on an orbiting space colony where apparently seeds have been brought to the colony and there is some agriculture workers, in very limited space.”
I think it is quite interesting the expansion of consciousness that will take place after 2100. According to Wambach, death, in that time, is a matter of choice. There are no diseases anymore, and anyone can reach 120 and decide they want to be off duty. This, personally, gives me a lot of hope, though in order to reach there we will first witness how the Earth is destroyed by human activity. And, as matters stand, I think not even movements like veganism, of which I take part, and is gradually growing, will be able to stop that destruction. The good side is the Earth has the power to regenerate itself, and it will do so as soon as a great number of human beings disappear.
Wambach’s final reflection is about what the world will be like when people that know death doesn’t exist are a majority. She says that it is easy to know looking at the behavior of the people that already know, luckily they do exist, even though we are just a few. These people are usually peaceable, don’t conduct war games and have no interest in material things. I can attest this, modesty apart. And according to Wambach, the best thing we can do to improve the general subconscious is looking for meaning in simple things, be gentler, be more universal, listen to children, pet your dog or cat, or be grateful of the sunlight when it shines.
I think she is totally right.